Struggling in a recession and seeing some increases in markets and signs of positive growth. It’s interesting this type of reform is being brought about at this time. A lot of 1st time buyers as wells as those who could not obtain conventional financing have been utilizing FHA mortgages for purchases. The House has passed its version of the FHA reform, and now it is on the Senate to vote on their version of the bill. Up front mortgage insurance has already seen an increase and now the monthly mortgage insurance may TRIPLE! Many within the FHA claim that this additional premium will help to strengthen the Administration’s balance sheet while building additional reserves to guarantee more loans and reduce long-term costs for borrowers. Others would argue that present borrowers’ monthly expenses will rise and make it harder for others to qualify.
The bill also mandates additional oversight as the FHA will now be able to further tighten underwriting standards and enforce additional accountability on providers of FHA guaranteed financing. Lenders will now have to sign indemnification agreements in order to provide these loans, so that in the case where a lender is judged to have originated a loan via fraudulent means, that lender will be forced to repay the FHA for any claims related losses.
This new bill might very well purge our market of the bad apples, leaving behind only the good guys to service the buyers. The reverse could also very well happen as well. For example, to ensure that what happened never happens again, our regulatory system fails us and a vital path to homeownership dries up, whereby no lender wants to use the programs out of fear, which is now a legitimate concern.
On the surface, making the same product more expensive in our current market doesnt appear too attractive. However, removing some of the “bad apples” from the lending marketplace does. (FEEL FREE TO DO THIS WITHOUT CHARGING BUYERS MORE…..)
Like with a lot of changes, we will have to judge in hindsight whether good or bad.
